“The Sea Shall Have Them” is Now Available

I’ve written little fiction about the ocean, but last summer I wrote a series of ocean-inspired stories.  At that time, I wondered if any of them would be “good” enough to be publishedAt least one was.

The Sea Shall Them,” is now available at Liquid Imagination.  This one is published in their literary story section.  I guess it’s “literary.”  It’s structure is definitely experimental, and it’s one of the darker pieces I’ve written.  Here’s an excerpt:

          Daniel can’t remember the name of the woman he left sleeping in his apartment.  He calls her The Artist, another in the endless progression of women since Susan, all of them nameless — The Artist, The Doctor, The Blonde, The Receptionist.
          He rolls down the window and cool, dry air streams in, burning off his sweat.  With a shaky hand he eats the sandwich he bought at the Kwik Stop just off I-5.  It fills his belly like ballast.  The hum of tires on pavement soothes him.  Desert blacktop is always glassy smooth like it was poured yesterday.
          The empty road stretches to the sky, bruised purple fading to coral as dawn approaches.  His grandfather used to tell him that the desert got hot every day because the rocks caught fire at dawn. 
          Yet another of his stories.

No sign of the ocean yet, so you’ll just have to read more….

The publication has selected some interesting artwork to go with my story.  I don’t think it’s custom artwork, but it’s fitting .  As always, be sure to check out the other stories published at Liquid Imagination, and I hope you enjoy “The Sea Shall Have Them.”

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Words to Live By

In 2005, Steve Jobs delivered the commencement address to Stanford’s outgoing class.  If you haven’t read what he had to say, take a moment and read it, I’ll wait….

Ordinarily I don’t care for inspirational speeches, but I read this one because I heard a quote pulled from it on NPR last week and wanted to know where it came from.  The quote was:

Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.  You are already naked.  There is no reason not to follow your heart.  Stay hungry.  Stay foolish.

It’s a fascinating quote about committing yourself to chasing your dreams.  It’s about not being complacent.  It’s about laying it all out there in pursuit of what is truly important to you.  These are great words to live by.  What may be the most remarkable thing about this quote, however, is that it’s only one of many from what might be the best inspirational speeches I’ve ever read.  Whatever you might think of Steve Jobs—love him or hate him or neither—the man was very, very wise.

Posted in Inspiration | Leave a comment

The Artwork for “Requiem for Shiva”

Requiem for Shiva,” which appears in the February issue of The Future Fire, is my first story for which a publication provided custom art work.  Oregon artist Rhiannon Rasmussen-Silverstein produced two fantastic black and white drawings (they look like charcoal drawings to me) that do an incredible job of capturing the mood of my story.

“Requiem for Shiva” is about loss and redemption, and an iconic image in the story is the “walker,” a mechanical device capable of cross-dimensional travel and destroying worlds.  Ms. Rasmussen-Silverstein’s two drawings capture the walker’s sleek and terrifying presence.

In addition to being skilled with charcoals, Ms. Rasmussen-Silverstein is a talented printer, as a visit to her online gallery will show.  Much of her work is reminiscent of Hawaiian block printing, which should come as no surprise because she originally comes from the islands.  I’m impressed by her color prints—I particularly like “and be not afraid” and “the wolf forest”—becasue they are dark, intricate and fascinating.  She is a fantastic artist, and I recommend you check out her artwork.

Posted in Science Fiction, Writing | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

“Requiem for Shiva” Now Available

The February issue of The Future Fire containing my story “Requiem for Shiva” is now available for free reading.  Joining me in the issue are Ian Sales (who is editing a forthcoming anthology called Rocket Science), S. Ali, A. J. Fitzwater, and Mark D. Dunn. 

Here’s an excerpt from “Requiem from Shiva” to whet your appetite:

          A flash of pink, low and to his left, caught Endahl’s attention.
          He leaned forward until the straps dug into his shoulders.
          In a ditch along the side of the road, a woman clutched to her breast a small child in a pink dress. The little girl, pigtailed and no more than three, struggled to get away. The woman’s dark face looked up at him, her eyes wide. Her mouth moved, but no words came out. Yet Endahl could read her lips, as clearly as if he could hear her plea: “Please don’t hurt her.”

You can read the whole story here (I hope you enjoy it), and while you’re there, be sure to check out the other stories in the issue.

Posted in Science Fiction, Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Nebula Award Nominees: Best Novel and Novella

A few days ago, I posted the Nebula Award nominees in the novelette and short stories.  At the time, I didn’t post the nominees for best novel and novella because I doubt I’ll vote on these categories—I’ve read only a couple of the nominees, and I probably will not have time to read them all before voting closes on March 30th.  I’d like to recognize them however, so the Nebula Award nominees for best novel  and novella are:

Best Novel:

Among Others by Jo Walton
Embassytown by China Miéville
Firebird by Jack McDevitt
God’s War by Kameron Hurley
Mechanique: A Tale of the Circus Tresaulti by Genevieve Valentine
The Kingdom of Gods by N.K. Jemisin

Best Novella:

Kiss Me Twice,” Mary Robinette Kowal (Asimov’s Science Fiction)
Silently and Very Fast,” Catherynne M. Valente (Clarkesworld Magazine)
“The Ice Owl,” Carolyn Ives Gilman (The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction)
The Man Who Bridged the Mist,” Kij Johnson (Asimov’s Science Fiction)
The Man Who Ended History: A Documentary,” Ken Liu (Panverse Three)
“With Unclean Hands,” Adam-Troy Castro (Analog Science Fiction and Fact)

In the novel category, I’ve only read Ms. Valentine’s Mechanique: A Tale of the Circus Tresaulti, which I highly recommend.  It’s not a books for everyone; it’s literary, experimental, smart, engrossing, and dark—I’ve never read anything quite like it before.  In the novella category, I’ve also only read one.  “The Ice Owl” was well-written, but didn’t do much for me. 

Congratulations to all of the nominees.

Posted in Writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Considerations Before Venturing into the Self-Publishing Jungle

As the number of stories I publish increases, I’m beginning to think about ways to further market them.  Traditionally, authors either sold them as reprints to other publications (e.g., anthologies) or collected into a single volume and sold them to a traditional book publisher.  Both of these routes face considerable challenges, especially for an aspiring writer who lacks name recognition. 

Recently, self-publishing has become a more viable option, especially e-publishing.  While the “stigma” of the vanity press is still there, it certainly isn’t as strong as it once was.  New do-it-yourself e-publishing has also allowed authors the ability to produce quality e-books with relatively low up-front costs (compared to “paper” book publishing), making it possible to produce single-story e-books or small collections that can then be sold for reasonable prices.

But is self-publishing something a writer should do, even as a last resort? 

A few authors whose blogs I regularly read recently published some thoughts on “traditional” versus “self” publishing.  Tracie McBride (a fellow Hopeful Monster) is ready to embrace e-publishing for her short fiction, whereas Marc Schuster wrote an interesting post about how he is glad he chose not to self-publish his forthcoming book, The Grievers, and instead trunk it for several years, revise it after improving his writing craft, and find a traditional publisher.  Both authors make compelling arguments for the choice made.

Personally, I’m still undecided.  I think the choice to self-publish depends upon many factors, the most important of which is the material under consideration.  I’d think long and hard about self-publishing a novel, primarily for the reasons raised by Marc Schuster, e.g., finding your audience.  Short fiction I view differently, however, because self-publishing, especially e-publishing, provides the opportunity to produce individual or small collections.  If the stories are previously published, their marketability is considerably diminished, and self-publishing offers a chance to continue earning money off a story that would likely be sitting around doing nothing.

While I have no definitive plans, I think at some point I will try self-publishing some of my short fiction, either individually or in a small collection.  At this time, I don’t think I would self-publish a novel.  Now all of this might change if I can continue to find success in pro-rate publications (with large readerships) and build enough name recognition that people would begin to actively seek my fiction.  At that point, a self-published novel might make more sense.

Posted in Hopefull Monsters, Writing | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

2011 Nebula Award Nominees

In speculative fiction, there are two major awards given out annually: the Hugo Award (named for Hugo Gernsback) presented by the World Science Fiction Society and the Nebula Award presented by the Science Fiction Writers of America (SFWA).  Yesterday, the SFWA announced the nominees for this year’s award (for the calendar year 2011).

While the awards cover many categories, I’m most interested in the short fiction categories.  Here are the nominees for best novelette:

Fields of Gold,” Rachel Swirsky (Eclipse 4)
“Ray of Light,” Brad R. Torgersen (Analog Science Fiction and Fact)
Sauerkraut Station,” Ferrett Steinmetz (Giganotosaurus)
Six Months, Three Days,” Charlie Jane Anders (Tor.com)
The Migratory Pattern of Dancers,” Katherine Sparrow (Giganotosaurus)
The Old Equations,” Jake Kerr (Lightspeed Magazine)
What We Found,” Geoff Ryman (The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction)

and for short story:

Her Husband’s Hands,” Adam-Troy Castro (Lightspeed Magazine)
Mama, We are Zhenya, Your Son,” Tom Crosshill (Lightspeed Magazine)
Movement,” Nancy Fulda (Asimov’s Science Fiction,)
Shipbirth,” Aliette de Bodard (Asimov’s Science Fiction
The Axiom of Choice,” David W. Goldman (New Haven Review)   
The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees,” E. Lily Yu (Clarkesworld Magazine)
The Paper Menagerie,” Ken Liu (The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction)

Several of these are available for free reading online, and many of the print magazines (Analog, Asimov’s and Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction) will post their nominees online in the near future, if they haven’t already.  While none of my work was nominated (only things published in 2011 were eligible), it’s nice to see some of the publications where I’ve had stories appear get recognized (e.g., Lightspeed Magazine, Asimov’s).  It’s also nice to see some familiar names on the list along with many new names that I might not recognize today, but will probably know better in the future. 

With my recent acceptance into SFWA, I’m eligible to nominate and vote for the Nebula Awards.  I’ve read about a third of the stories listed above, so I’ve got some reading to do before the voting closes on March 30th.

Posted in Writing | Tagged | 7 Comments

Nothing Like a Little Research to Make the Time Go By

One of the reason I like writing speculative fiction is it gives me another reason to learn new things.  I’m a naturally inquisitive person to start with—that’s probably why I got into science as my day job—and I like to browse sites like Wikipedia for amusement.  Doing research for stories I’m writing helps to focus what might otherwise be aimless reading. 

Here’s a few of the interesting things I’ve learned over the past few months while doing research for stories I’m writing:

Closed timelike curves don’t necessarily violate causality.  (Also see the Novikov self-consistency principle).

You can get an atmospheric diving suits that will keep a diver at one atmosphere of pressure, thus eliminating the potential of decompression sickness, e.g., the bends.

A keffiyeh is a traditional arabic head scarf to protect the head from the sun.  I’d always seen the headwear on people like Yasser Arafat, but I’d never know what it was actually called.

Molecular gastronomy is a type of cuisine.  To make it requires some equipment more common to scientific laboratories than kitchens: centrifuges, distillers, syringes, and liquid nitrogen.

There are five elements in the Japanese philosophy called Godai: air, earth, fire, water, and void.  These are found symbolically in zen gardens and Buddhist architecture.

The Battle of Huế was one of the longest and deadliest battles of the Vietnam War.

Has anyone else learned anything interesting recently?

Posted in Inspiration, Writing | 1 Comment

I’ve Finished My Story, So Now What?

Writers like to talk, and a favorite topic of conversation is where to submit manuscripts.  How do you decide where to send your latest masterpiece if it wasn’t written with a specific market in mind?  It’s a good questions, with as many answers as there are writers. 

I subscribe to the start-at-the-top-and-work-your-way-down philosophy (for the most part).  I consider pro-rate publications first, then semi-pro publications, and finally token-rate ones.  In general, I don’t submit to non-paying markets by principle—I put a lot of work into my story, and I’d rather publish it myself than give it away. 

Within each of these categories—pro, semi-pro, and token—how do I decide where to send something?  This is where things get subjective, and there’s no easy answer.  I first narrow my choices based on the story itself by asking: “Does the magazine publish this type of story?”  For example, Analog (one of the “Big Three” in speculative fiction) doesn’t publish fantasy, so if my story has magic and dragons, I cross Analog off the list.  (This may seem obvious, but I’ve read interviews with editors who talk about receiving stories in the wrong genre.)  This will shorten my list, sometimes considerably. 

From there I consider a combination of the exposure my story would get, the prestige of the publication, and the response time.  I find it a little surprising, but my first cut is based on response time.  Some publications take a ridiculously long time to review manuscripts (Tor.com, I’m looking at you and your 365+ day response time).  Most pro-rate publications frown on simultaneous submissions, and I simply don’t want to tie up a manuscript that long, especially when the acceptance rate at many pro-rate publications is significantly less than 1%.  I’m usually willing to wait two or three months for a response, but the shorter the turnaround, the higher on my submission list I’ll place a publication.

Prestige and exposure tend to go together.  The higher the prestige of the publication, generally the larger the readership.  I want people to read my work.  I want a lot of people to read my work, so I aim for markets with large readership.  Most of the pro-rate publications have good readership, but some don’t.  I’ll submit to Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine before I submit to one of the lesser known pro-rate publications because I know Asimov’s has a large readership.

I know some writers will only submit to pro-rate publications, but I not one of them.  I don’t make a living writing short stories, and in all likelihood I never will, so I have few reservations about submitting to semi-pro and token rate publications.  Besides, many of the semi-pro and token publications are well-respected and have strong niche readership, for example Andromeda Spaceways Inflight Magazine and Shimmer are well-respected and have their diehard fans.  For semi-pro and token rate publications, I use the same three factors when deciding where to submit: response time, prestige, and exposure.  I submit until I sell the story, lose faith and trunk it—this has only happened once—or I run out of markets, which has yet to happen for any story. 

So there you have it, my philosophy of submissions.  Is it the right approach for everyone?  Probably not, but I find it works for me.  If you have a different approach to chosing markets, I’d be interested in hearing about it.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Savaging the Classics

As my fiction starts to appear in pro-rate magazines, it’s also starting to gather reviews.  I’ve had a few stories reviewed by some of the larger speculative fiction publications, like Locus and Tangent.  They’ve been mixed, which I don’t think is particularly surprising, given the type of things I write.  No one can expect great reviews from everyone, and frankly, that’s not the point of writing or reviewing, in my opinion.  I write what I like; reviewers praise what they like.  Everyone’s tastes vary.

That doesn’t mean a bad review doesn’t sting.  It does…which made this post by M. Edward McNally the perfect balm for that review sting.

Mr. McNally takes a bite out of 1-star reviews by posting reader reviews of beloved classics.  He says these are actual “reviews” found on popular site (a little sleuthing traced them back to Goodreads, where in my story “Thief of Futures” actually got a good review!).  While many of the reviews sound like they were written by teens forced to read the books, it just goes to show that even the classics are not above a little savaging.  Some of my favorites highlighted by Mr. McNally:

The Iliad by Homer:  “I know there’s a good story in there somewhere but it gets lost in unending, ridiculous, irrelevant dialogue.”

The Lord of The Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien:  “What is seriously lacking in Tolkien’s world is any original idea or just imagination in general.”

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov:  “Blah blah I hate America blah blah I’m smart blah blah I’m from Europe blah blah.”

So the next time I get a bad review, I just need to remember I’m in good company.  I know I’ll re-read Mr. McNally’s post periodically to reset my perspective.

Posted in Writing | Tagged | 2 Comments