Appreciating the (Point of) View

My writing group, Hopefull Monsters, occasionally engages in discussions of writing craft.  A recent discussion got me thinking about point of view, or POV.  The POV is the perspective from which a story is written, for example first person (the “I” POV) or third person (the “he/she” POV).  The POV is important because it is the filter through which the reader experiences everything in the story.  POV is as important as the plot, characters, and conflict. 

Yet, it seems like many aspiring writers don’t think about POV at any point in the writing process.  Instead, they default into whatever is comfortable (often the first person POV) or into what has become the “industry standard”—third person.  I’d argue that every writer should consider the strengths and weaknesses of the various POVs and consciously select the one that allows the more effective telling of the story.  This assessment should be done before writing a single word.

I don’t have a favorite POV.  I’ve published things in first person (e.g., “Thief of Futures” and “The Fine Art of Surfacing”) as well as third (e.g., “Observations on a Clock” and “Still Life Through Water Droplets”).  In all of these cases, I weighed the pros and cons before I started the story, and selected the POV I thought would most effectively allow me to tell my story.  Sometimes I get it wrong, and I go back and re-write with a different POV— “Thief of Futures” started out in third person, but I soon realized it would be more effective in first person. 

So how do I decide what POV to use?  My analytical side says I should build a dichotomous decision tree, but I’ll just run through the questions I consider:

1.  How close do I want my reader to my main character ?  Third person puts distance between the reader and main character, whereas first person is “cozy” with one character.

2.  Do I want to “live” in my main character’s head?  I find intense introspection is often more natural in the first person POV.  If introspection will be important to my story, I’ll lean toward first person.

3.  Do I want to limit the reader’s view?  A first person narrator limits view of the world—only things my narrator knows or experiences can come into the story.  Sometimes I want that; other times I don’t.  Third person POV gives more latitude for a wider world view.

4.  Does my potential first person narrator have an interesting perspective on the world and thus an interesting voice?  If the answer is “no,” then I either change the narrator or change the POV.

At some point in the process, every writer thinks about plot, characters, and conflict.  I think successful writers also think about POV and the myriad of other “details” that are often overlooked by aspiring writers—tense, pace, tone, etc.  I find these other details are often the difference between a good story that never quite gets out of the slush pile and a great story that sells, so don’t leave these “details” to chance.  It’s become apparent to me over the years that great stories seldom happen by accident.

Posted in Writing | Tagged | 4 Comments

Frivolous Fun

I just figured out how to make it snow. 

It’s been years since I’ve seen the real white stuff…brrr.  The digital snow is nice.  I can’t make a snowman out of it, but at least I don’t have to shovel it.  For some reason, I’m suddenly craving a steaming mug of hot cocoa….

Posted in General News | Leave a comment

“Thief of Futures” Podcast Now Available

Paul Cole at Beam Me Up! has posted part one of his podcast of “Thief of Futures.”  Mr. Cole reads short fiction as part of his science news show, broadcast out of WRFR in Rockland, Maine.  It’s an eclectic show, with space news, spacey music, and some very good short speculative fiction.  If you don’ have time to soak up the whole episode, part one of “Thief of Futures” starts at the 32:30 minute mark.

My story shares the episode with an entertaining flash fiction piece written and read by Jason Butterfield called “Out of Time” (originally published in Antipodean).  Jason’s story is clever and fun; I recommend you check it out.  It starts at the 11:50 minute mark of the broadcast.

Posted in Science Fiction, Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Rules for Writing”

I “discovered” writer Marc Schuster’s website, Abominations, a few weeks ago when he dropped by and left a comment on one of my posts.  He runs a fantastic site with frequent posts that are always interesting and often laugh-out-loud funny—check out his post about mail sent to his deceased dog.  I recommend you pay him a visit.

Recently, Marc posted a link to an interesting article in The Guardian that contained “rules for writing” from a number of well-known authors.  Inspired by Elmore Leonard’s “10 Rules of Writing,” the dos and don’ts of the fourteen writers, including Margret Atwood and Neil Gaiman, made for interesting reading and analysis.  As you might expect, the various lists had many commonailties—write every day; finish what you write; write what you like, not what you think will sell—but they also had a few that really jumped out at me, for example:

Interesting verbs are seldom very interesting.—Jonathan Frazen 

Description is hard.  Remember that all description is an opinion about the world.  Find a place to stand.—Anne Enright

When people tell you something’s wrong or doesn’t work for them, they are almost always right.  When they tell you exactly what they think is wrong and how to fix it, they are almost always wrong.—Neil Gaiman

Of the lists, P. D. James’ struck the strongest chord with me.  She had only five items in her list of “Ten Rules for Writing” (as a short story writer, I like her economy):

1.  Increase your word power.  Words are the raw material of our craft.  The greater your vocabulary the more ­effective your writing.  We who write in English are fortunate to have the richest and most versatile language in the world.  Respect it.

2. Read widely and with discrimination.  Bad writing is contagious.

3. Don’t just plan to write—write.  It is only by writing, not dreaming about it, that we develop our own style.

4. Write what you need to write, not what is currently popular or what you think will sell.

5. Open your mind to new experiences, particularly to the study of other ­people.  Nothing that happens to a writer—however happy, however tragic—is ever wasted.

All good words to write by.

Posted in Inspiration, Writing | Tagged | 5 Comments

NaNoWriMo: The Final Tally

November is over.  NaNoWriMo has officially ended.  Whew!  With yesterday’s effort, I finished just shy of 53,000 words for the month.  While I made the NaNoWriMo word count, I came up short on the goal of finishing the draft of my novel.  I think I have about 15,000 words to go, which puts finishing it by the end of the year in jeopardy because I also have several short stories awaiting final editing before I can submit them, and I can’t realistically keep the daily NaNoWriMo pace for another month.  Getting those short stories out is a high priority for m.  This creates a real conundrum, especially when finishing the novel was one of my writing goals for 2011.

While I ponder my options, here’s my final NaNoWriMo tally sheet:

Nov 22—1,907 words
Nov 23—1,727 words
Nov 24—2,334 words
Nov 25—1,811 words
Nov 26—1,767 words
Nov 27—2,226 words
Nov 28—1,288 words
Nov 29—1,750 words
Nov 30—1,794 words
Week 4 (+2 days)—16,604 words
Final Total—52,968 words

Whether you’ve met the 50,000-word goal or not, congratulations to everyone who took up the NaNoWriMo challenge this year.  I doubt most of what was written will ever see publication (and probably shouldn’t), but I don’t see that as the benefit of NaNoWriMo.  I believe the real benefit is the motivation it provides people to sit down and write a story.  Everyone has a story to tell; so few every try to write it.

Posted in Goals, Writing | Tagged | 1 Comment

A Little Love for Thief

Rusty Keele runs a site called Best Science Fiction Stories.  Every few days, he features a story that has caught his eye, and last Monday he featured my story “Thief of Futures.”  Considering the number of speculative fiction stories published every month, it’s a pleasant surprise to have someone highlight one of my stories, especially when that someone is unrelated to me, and thus not genetically predisposed to like it.

This was the first I’ve seen of Mr. Keele’s site, but it’s quickly become one of my favorites and not just because it’s featured one of my stories—althought that certainly helps.  Looking at the list of “best stories,” I see several favorites: “Jefty is Five” by the incredible Harlan Ellison, “Johnny Mnemonic” by William Gibson, “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes, and numerous favorites from Philip K. Dick.   It’s nice to join such good company.

Elsewhere, Sam Tomaino, the short fiction reviewer at SFRevu gave “Thief of Futures” a thumbs up, saying “Minton writes a good little story here” and recommending that readers check out the entire September issue of Lightspeed Magazine.  “Thief of Futures” also picked up its first reader review at Goodreads: “Neat premise, and a backdrop you’ll sink right into.  Read this one…then seriously consider signing up for Lightspeed Magazine – they’ve put out some seriously good stuff in their short history.”

I don’t write stories thinking about how readers will react to them (I write the story as I think it needs to be written), so it’s gratifying when someone actually enjoys it enough to write a few words about it.

Posted in Science Fiction, Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Editors Beware: Writers Talk

For me, the best thing I can get from an editor is a letter saying he or she wants to buy my story.  Second to that is a personal rejection, wherein the editor offers me a few words of constructive criticism about why he or she didn’t buy my story.  I’ve always valued the personal rejection because it’s a tidbit of feedback in a business that offers so little.

A writing colleague, whose published numerous stories, shared with me a “personal” rejection from the editors at Ray Gun Revival.  I put the quotes around the word personal, because the rejection was down-right mean—it didn’t just attempt to provide feedback, it seemed like a shot to the gut intended to hurt (feedback that includes words like “horrible” and “not worthwhile” is generally not constructive).  While my colleague may have agreed with some of the criticism of the story expressed in the letter, I found the delivery unprofessional, to say the least.  I’m not sure what the editors were hoping to achieve, but I know my colleague will never submit anything to them again and neither will I—not that the folks at Ray Gun Revival probably care.  I find it disappointing that any publication that considers itself a professional market would ever send anything like it.  Maybe there’s the rub: I assumed Ray Gun Revival aspired to be “professional.”

So to the editors at Ray Gun Revival—Mr. Johne Cook, Mr. Paul Christian Glenn, and Ms. L. S. King—maybe you think your “personal” rejections are edgy or amusing, but to me, they make your publication look amateurish and you a trio of unprofessional…well…let’s just leave it at that, shall we?

Posted in Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

NaNoWriMo: Week 3

It was a struggle, but the third week of NaNoWriMo is over.  Surprisingly, I’m still hanging in there—good thing I got ahead of the word count the first two weeks, because my gains were lost last week while I was traveling for the day job.  Here’s a quick update:

Nov 15—840 words
Nov 16—333 words
Nov 17—1,101 words
Nov 18—2,808 words
Nov 19—1,755 words
Nov 20—1,966 words
Nov 21—1,935 words
Week 3—10,738 words
Total words—36,364 words

This puts me on pace for 51,949 words by the end of the month.  Hopefully I’ll be able to pick up the pace down the stretch.  Even if I do, it looks like I won’t get the draft of the novel done by November 30th—there’s simply too much story still to go.  That means I’ll have juggle finishing it along with several back-logged short stories in December.

Posted in Goals, Writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Thief Gets a Dose of Vinegar

As a writer, I never know what will happen to one of my stories once it’s out there.  I expect people to read it, discuss it, and critique it as a piece of literature and (to a lesser extent) as commentary about the world in which we live.  I believe fiction should say something about the human experience—it needn’t be profound, but the more deeply a writer touches the reader, the more likely his work will to be remembered long after the reading is done.

Having appeared in the widely read Lightspeed Magazine, “Thief of Futures” has gotten the largest readership of any of my published works.  Even so, I was surprised to see it included in an academic discussion of the politics of wealth and privilege.  Samuel X. Brase edits a new publication called Cosmic Vinegar, which is dedicated to examining politics and economics as it appears in speculative fiction.  In the November issue, Mr. Brase has some interesting things to say about how “Thief of Futures” reflects the current status quo of upward mobility being restricted to the wealthy and/or privileged while the faceless masses are left in poverty.  When writing “Thief of Futures”, I never intended to take a subversive stand on this particular issue.  That’s part of the point Mr. Brase is making: much speculative fiction accepts the status quo when it has an opportunity to be revolutionary.  I can’t argue with his assessment.  While the dichotomy between wealth=security and poverty=insecurity was something I wanted explore in this story, it alone wasn’t the story I wanted to tell.   

I thank Mr. Brase for taking the time to read my story, and I’m glad that it inspired him to analyze it in a way that I never would have guessed.  Even though he found my story did little to advance a new world vision in which upward mobility is decoupled from wealth and privilege, I hope he still enjoyed “Thief of Futures” for its human tale about what a man will do to protect his daughter.

Posted in Science Fiction, Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Three Sales for Three Monsters

I’ve collected several rejections over the last several weeks, but three members of my Hopefull Monsters writing group have sold stories:

D.J. Cockburn sold “Seeking Kailash” to Stupefying Stories.  

Richard Zwicker’s “The Reopened Cask” will appear in Whortleberry Press’ Strange Mysteries 4.

Tracie McBride found another home for “The Changing Tree” after the magazine she originally sold it to folded before it could be published.  “The Changing Tree” will appear in Bards and Sages Quarterly.

Congrats to all three of my fellow writers.

Posted in Hopefull Monsters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment