A Funny Thing Happened….

I ride the bus to my day job.  Not only do I save a lot of hassle doing it (I work in the middle of the city and parking is horrendous and expensive), but I also use it to get a lot writing work done, a sort of mobile office.  A few days ago I was riding the bus and scribbling away furiously on story revisions.  I hope I wasn’t, but I was probably jabbering away at myself at the same time, like some sort of crazy person.  After several minutes, the woman sitting next to me asked what I was doing, and I told her I was revising a story.  Naturally she asked if I was a writer, and without thinking, I said, “Yes, I’m a writer.”

I find this interesting because I’ve never identified myself as a “writer.”  I’ve always identified myself as “someone who writes,” which I think is different because it implies that I write in addition to something else, that writing is a secondary thing.  Writers to me are people like Hemingway, Faulkner, Atwood, etc. who are identified by the larger world by and through their writing.

So after telling the woman on the bus I was a writer, I had a nice conversation with her and her husband about writing and some of my publications.  It turns out they were science fiction and fantasy fans, so we talked about favorite books.  Her husband dabbled in writing, and expressed an interest in publishing, so we also talked the business side of writing.  Overall, it was a pleasant conversation.  Only after I had gotten off at my stop did I realize what had transpired.

I’m not sure if this actually means anything or not.  Have I crossed some sort of mental bridge without even realizing it?  I don’t know.  I don’t feel any different—the temperature of my forehead says I’m not sick.  I don’t think my writing is any different.  Yet, perhaps my perception of what my writing means to me has changed.  Hmmm…I wonder if this is a good thing…hmmm…I think maybe it is.

Posted in Writing | 1 Comment

Seeing Orange and Red

I track my submissions using the The Grinder, an excellent Duotrope alternative created by David Steffen and Anthony Sullivan over at Diabolical Plots.  In the The Grinder, the status of my submissions are color coded, going from black to orange to red as they approach, enter and passed the estimated response-time windows for a market.

Half of my submissions are now in the orange or red, which means I’m into or have passed the average expected response window.  I know this is generally a good thing–acceptances at most publications take longer than rejections, so I’ve likely gotten past the first readers and advanced into the next round of the process.  That doesn’t mean my stories will get picked, but they have likely made it into that exclusive 5-10% of manuscripts to hit the editor’s desk for final consideration.  That’s a nice place to be, so I just keep telling myself to be patient…to stop compulsively checking The Grinder a dozen times a day…to keep writing instead….

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

“The Schrödinger War” Snapped Up at Lightspeed

I sold one of those stories I mentioned the other dayLightspeed Magazine has accepted “The Schrödinger War,” and it took about six hours from submission to acceptance.  Wow, light speed indeed.  I guess one of my fellow Hopeful Monsters wasn’t far off when he told me to “send it to Lightspeed…they should bite your hand off for it.”  Fortunately I still have all my fingers.

“The Schrödinger War” was a story I struggled with for over a year.  It’s probably the hardest story I’ve every finished, so it’s particularly gratifying to see it sell quickly and to such a wonderful market.  This is my third sale to Lightspeed Magazine since the middle of 2011, so I almost feel like I’m becoming a bit of a regular.  That’s pretty cool because I really like the magazine.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Finding the Groove Again

I’ve been in a bit of a writing funk the past few months.  I’ve not had writer’s block, per se; the words just haven’t been coming as easily as they have in the past.  The last three weeks, however, I’ve made some progress at clawing my way out of the hole.  I completed a new story—it’s only a flash piece, but it’s the first entirely new short story I’ve finished in a couple of months—and revised on another story that had been collecting dust on my hard drive.  I’ve also got a third story nearing completion (another year-old draft), which would keep me on pace to meet my writing goal of a finished story per month.

I also recently passed the two-thirds mark on the novel I started during last year’s NaNoWriMo, and I hope to have the first draft finished sometime around the beginning May, provided, that is, I can figure out how it should end.  I know vaguely how I want things to go; I’m just not sure how to get there.  Fortunately, I’m confident a flash of inspiration will come; here’s hoping that lightning strike happens soon.

It’s times like these when I know I just need to write my way out of the dry spot.  This is especially true if I want to turn fiction writing into a viable second (or maybe first) career.  Inspiration is a wonderful thing, but it’s not there all the time, and a successful writer doesn’t have the luxury of writing only when the muse favors him or her.  Sometimes it’s simply a matter of butt in chair and fingers on keys.

Posted in Writing | 5 Comments

“Dreams in Dust” Finds a Second Home

Wow, that happened fast.  I sold the reprint rights to my story “Dreams in Dust” in the span of about five minutes to a forthcoming anthology, Wastelands II, edited by John Joseph Adams.  Mr. Adams emailed me out of the blue this morning asking if he could publish it.  After I got over my what’s-John-Joseph-Adams-doing-emailing-me? surprise, it took me just a few minutes to print, sign and send back the contract (got to love the interweb).  Who in their right mind would turn down an offer to have a story in one of Mr. Adam’s anthologies?  Not me, that’s for sure.

Now before you think this is too surprising, I should point out that Mr. Adams also bought the first rights to my story—he’s the editor and publisher of Lightspeed Magazine, where “Dreams in Dust” first appeared last December—so I knew he already liked “Dreams in Dust.”  Still, I never expected him to pick it up for his anthology.  I’m particularly excited to appear in one of Mr. Adam’s anthologies because he always seems to attract the biggest name in speculative fiction.  The first Wastelands anthology, for example, had stories by some of my favorite writers, including George R. R. Martin, Tobias Bucknell, Carol Emshwiller, and Paolo Bacigalupi.  I can’t wait to see the complete table of contents for volume two.

Wastelands II is slated for release in July 2013, and it’s now available for preorder at online booksellers like Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Powell’s.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Thoughts on the 2012 Nebula Nominees: Short Story

I’ve finished the seven short stories nominated for the 2012 Nebula Award (you can find links to all of them here).  They cover an impressive range of topics and styles.  Something that struck me more with this year’s nominees than it did with last year’s was the literary bent of all these tales (and I don’t mean “literary” as a bad word here).  These are not pulp science fiction or cliché high fantasy.  These stories are rich in structure, language, setting, and most prominently character.

I can appreciate the craft that went into each story, but I found that not all of them were for me.  While I’ve not made my final decision on which story will get my Nebula vote, I did find Aliette de Bodard’s “Immersion” particularly impressive.  This should come as no surprise to speculative fiction readers because she’s been producing top-notch short fiction for several years now.  In “Immersion” Ms. de Bodard has taken a very simple scene and layered on so much meaning, suppress conflict, and emotion that it is simply stunning to behold.  A simple negotiation for a banquet becomes an exploration of cultural domination, colonization, and decolonization of both a society and an individual.  It also has the most effective use of 2nd-person point of view I’ve ever seen.  I simply could not put this one down, and that’s saying a lot for me.  I also enjoyed Tom Crosshill’s “Fragmentation, or Ten Thousand Goodbyes” and Leah Cypess’ “Nanny’s Day.”  Each has incredible character depth and emotion range.

If you haven’t read the nominees yet, you’re missing out some excellent stories and fine examples of what speculative fiction can be.  While I suspect not all of them will appeal to any single reader, all are worthy of your time.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , | 2 Comments

A Post for the Uninspired

I’m feeling a little uninspired today, but I wanted to post something.  Believe it or not, writers aren’t endless fountains of inspiration.  Sure, I go through times when I’m fending off a torrent of ideas, but I also go through droughts.  Fortunately my droughts tend not to last too long, and I usually have a backlog—a much-too-big backlog at that—of things to revise and submit.  (I spent my writing time today revising a story I wrote last year.)  To succeed as a writer, I need to write, and that means writing even when the inspiration doesn’t clock me over the head.  Sometimes it’s just a matter of starting; the very act of writing can often lead to something, sort of like what has happened here.

When I started writing this post, I had no idea what I was going to write.  In fact, I was simply going to write a sentence or two and direct you to a post I read earlier to today and really liked.  Writer and musician Eric Baker keeps a wonderful blog called Clawing at the Keys (love the title), and recently he’s posted some nice entries on character creation.  His post from a couple of days ago was about character motivation, and I really liked what he had to say.  Character motivation is one of the key elements to making a story satisfying as opposed to making it one that leaves the reader wonder, “Why did that idiot do that?”  So if you have the chance, check out Eric’s post—even if you don’t agree with what he’s written, you can always enjoy the cool, groovy music video (he posts one with every post).  Oh, while your there, be sure to check out his fiction, too; I especially enjoyed his delightfully twisted story “Worm.”

Posted in General News, Writing | Tagged | 3 Comments

A Satisfying Second Helping

Back in January, Waylines published their debut issue and featured three short stories and three short films.  One of those films, The Maker, caught my eye, and the fiction wasn’t bad either, featuring stories by Beth Cato, Jeremy Sim, and Grayson Bray Morris.  Since then, I’ve been waiting to see if Waylines‘ next issue would feature more excellent work.

Waylines released issue two this week, and while I’ve yet to read it cover-to-cover, I have read and watched enough to say issue two is another is very strong outing.  While none of the three short films rose the brilliance of The Maker, all were well-crafted productions worth viewing.  I’ve started reading the fiction, too, and so far I’m enjoying Sean Ead’s “The Seer.”

If you’re looking for something diffrent to read, I recommend you check out Waylines.  They’ve only produced two issues, but editors David Rees-Thomas and Darryl Knickrehm are doing nice job of picking interesting fiction and compelling cinema, which bodes well for the future of this e-zine.  I’ll be keeping watch for issue three.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amazon: Only the End of the Funnel?

Over the past few months, I’ve been following some of the research on how people find and buy books (see here and here and here, if interested).  All this research is interesting from the social science perspective, but it’s also relevant to my writing aspirations, especially now that one of my 2013 writing goals is self-publish the first in a series of stories.

So when a fellow writer me to a story on how shoppers find books on Amazon, I found the information informative, sobering, but not too surprising after I thought about it.  At a recent digital media conference in London, a presentation was made examining the buying habitats of Amazon shoppers.  The data, collected by the Codex Group (a think tank that conducts book and publishing research) and presented by Douglas McCabe of Enders Analysis, showed that 48% of all purchases on Amazon were made through directed searches.  That means shoppers knew what they wanted, went directly to it online and bought it.  In contrast only 3% of purchases were the result of browsing, 4% came via staff picks, 10% from Amazon’s “bought/also bought” feature, 12% from various promotions and deals, and 17% from Amazon’s lists (e.g., Bestsellers, Top 100).  For the more visually inclined, here’s a nifty pie chart:

Amazon Pie

While 52% of books were found using non-directed searching, they were found through a variety of means, so there isn’t one be-all-end-all way that non-directed shoppers are finding books.  Many self-published authors seem to focus on cracking Amazon’s various list’s, yet only 17% of book purchases are made from all those assorted lists (not a bad number considering total sales, but still a small percentage).  This approach is certainly bound to help sell books, but seems to be missing the biggest piece of the pie: people who have already made up their minds what to buy before even logging into Amazon.  Many readers searching for books online already know what they want, so books get lost among Amazon’s 32 million book offerings.

All this data indicates that for nearly half of all reader’s, their opinion of a book is formed outside of Amazon, perhaps though reviews, social media or word of mouth.  So the key to unlocking sales through direct searches is getting word of your book out, and then funneling buyers back to online stores such as Amazon to find and buy it.  But how exactly does an independent author do this?

According to the Codex Group data—which covered book buying habits back to 2004—in 2010, 35% of book purchases were made after browsing in brick-and-mortar bookstores, including purchases at Amazon.  This approach was the primary method of book discovery.  In 2012, that figure dropped to 17%, which may be the result of the struggles of brick-and-mortar booksellers (e.g., the Borders bankruptcy), but also the rise of e-readers.  Over this time period, personal recommendations have grown more important, from 14% to 22%, most of which are made through personal contact, with the rest coming through email, phone, Facebook and other social media.  Interestingly, Facebook and other social media only account for 7% of recommendations, although I suspect that will rise in the coming years.  The road to success may very well be a combination of promotional giveaways and hand-selling your work to influential reviewers on sites like Goodreads and in book clubs.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

2012 Nebula Award Nominees: Novel and Novella

A couple of days ago, I posted the Nebula Award nominees in the novelette and short story categories.  While the novel and novella categories are of interest to me,  I didn’t post them because I doubt I’ll vote on these categories—I’ve not read many things longer than the average short story/novelette this year, and I doubt I’ll have time to read all the novel and novella nominees before voting closes on March 30th.  I’d would like to recognize them, however, so here are the nominees for best novel and novella.

Best Novel:

         • Throne of the Crescent Moon by Saladin Ahmed
         • Ironskin by Tina Connolly
         • The Killing Moon by N.K. Jemisin
         • The Drowning Girl by Caitlín R. Kiernan
         • Glamour in Glass by Mary Robinette Kowal
         • 2312 by Kim Stanley Robinson

Best Novella:

         • On a Red Station, Drifting, Aliette de Bodard (Immersion Press)
         • After the Fall, Before the Fall, During the Fall, Nancy Kress (Tachyon)
         • “The Stars Do Not Lie,” Jay Lake (Asimov’s)
         • All the Flavors,” Ken Liu (GigaNotoSaurus)
         • “Katabasis,” Robert Reed (Fantasy & Science Fiction)
         • Barry’s Tale,” Lawrence M. Schoen (Buffalito Buffet)

Congratulations to all of the nominees.  If you haven’t read them all yet, I recommend you buy them and read them.  I know they will be going on my ever-expanding “to read” list.

Posted in Writing | Tagged | Leave a comment